Modeling the students' mathematics achievement in Malaysia

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAhmad Nazim Aimran
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-30T04:39:53Z
dc.date.available2016-11-30T04:39:53Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.description.abstractThe main goal of this research is to assess the efficiency of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Normal Practice methods. This is because SEM is said to have a better estimation and prediction when multiple response items were involved in constructs. The efficiency of both methods was compared by using Absolute, Incremental and Parsimonious fitness indexes computed by AMOS graphic software. From the result of this research, it is found that SEM method achieved all fitness indexes required level while Normal Practice method failed to achieve Absolute and Parsimonious fit. As a conclusion, SEM method is proven to be more efficient in making estimation and prediction than the Normal Practice method.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4743
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTerengganu: Universiti Malaysia Terengganuen_US
dc.subjectQA 278.3 .A3 2014en_US
dc.subjectAhmad Nazim Aimranen_US
dc.subjectTesis FST 2014en_US
dc.subjectStructural equation modelingen_US
dc.subjectMultivariate analysisen_US
dc.titleModeling the students' mathematics achievement in Malaysiaen_US
dc.title.alternativecomparison between structural equation modeling (SEM) and normal practice methodsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Collections
Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi