Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://umt-ir.umt.edu.my:8080/handle/123456789/6507
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChoong Yew Cherng-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T03:42:55Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-19T03:42:55Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6507-
dc.description.abstractThere are advantages and disadvantages in every coral reef transect survey methods that were used in this study. The accuracy in most of the methods used in this study showed the significant difference in all transects. The major life form categories used in LIT and PIT is more favorable due to the lack of dive time for detail coral identification and expertise in identification. Meanwhile, underwater digital photography and video transect are able to identify the coral taxonomy due to the storable recorded data or images and sufficient of time. However, the underwater digital photography method is more favorable because of its cheaper cost than the video transect method. In other words, the cost affordable underwater digital photography method will become more and more popular in the future and will replace the traditional and the expensive video transect method.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTerengganu: Kolej Universiti Sains dan Teknologi Malaysiaen_US
dc.subjectChoong Yew Cherngen_US
dc.subjectLP 9 FST 2 2005en_US
dc.titleA comparative assessment of coral reef transect survey methodsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LP 9 FST 2 2005 Abstract.pdf672.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
LP 9 FST 2 2005 Full Text.pdf
  Restricted Access
4.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.