Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://umt-ir.umt.edu.my:8080/handle/123456789/5967
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSamsiah, Abdul Hamid-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-21T08:38:45Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-21T08:38:45Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationVol.11; Issue 4; 5913-5918 p.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1818 5800-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5967-
dc.description.abstractThis is a qualitative study that looks into theinterplay of crucial variables in the successful comprehension of two scientific texts of different topic familiarity and syntactic difficulty. Respondents were three EFL undergraduates with some prior knowledge on the two scientific texts but different levels of English proficiency. The aim was to see how they negotiate the two texts given their current level of English proficiency and prior knowledge. For this purpose, think aloud protocols and structured interviews were conducted to determine their strategy choices. The study shows that even though L2 proficiency and prior knowledge of the science topic are important contributors, strategy choices are instrumental to successful comprehension. While lower cognitive strategies are used to get the meaning from the written texts, it is crucial to use higher cognitive strategies to complete the understanding.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSocial Sciences (Pakistan)en_US
dc.subjectCognitive and metacognitive strategiesen_US
dc.subjectEFL learnersen_US
dc.subjectScientific textsen_US
dc.subjectSecond language readingen_US
dc.subjectThink aloud protocolen_US
dc.titleIt's All About Strategy Choices When Three EFL Undergraduates Read Two Scientific Textsen_US
dc.title.alternativeA Qualitative Insighten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.