Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://umt-ir.umt.edu.my:8080/handle/123456789/21673
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Fran Humphries | - |
dc.contributor.author | John A.H. Benzie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Clare Morrison | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-09T09:50:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-09T09:50:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-07 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://umt-ir.umt.edu.my:8080/handle/123456789/21673 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Convention on Biological Diversity provides a framework for countries to implement laws regulating the access, use and exchange of genetic resources, including how users and providers share the benefits from their use. While the international community has been preoccupied with resolving the unintended effects of access and benefit sharing (ABS) on domestication in agriculture for the past 25 years, its far-reaching consequences for global aquaculture has only recently dawned on policymakers, aquaculture producers and researchers. Using a systematic quantitative literature review methodology, we analysed the trends, biases and gaps in the ABS literature. Only 5% of the ABS literature related to the use and exchange of aquaculture genetic resources. Most of this literature related to use in developing countries or global use, but its authors were predominantly from developed countries. The literature covered a narrow range of countries (7) and regions (3), a narrow range of taxonomic groups (9) and a narrow range of uses. Given that aquaculture is the fastest growing global food production sector with products primarily from developing countries using over 580 species, there are significant gaps in aquaculture-related ABS literature. We conclude that the sector needs urgent analyses on the consequences of ABS restrictions, obligations and opportunities for its early stages of domestication and product development. We recommend priority areas for attention to ensure that rapidly evolving national ABS laws take into account the special characteristics and needs of the aquaculture sector. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd | en_US |
dc.subject | access and benefit sharing | en_US |
dc.subject | aquaculture | en_US |
dc.subject | aquatic genetic resources | en_US |
dc.subject | convention on biological diversity | en_US |
dc.title | A systematic quantitative literature review of aquaculture genetic resource access and benefit sharing | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | UMT Niche E-Book |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reviews in Aquaculture - 2018 - Humphries - A systematic quantitative literature review of aquaculture genetic resource.pdf Restricted Access | 1.4 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in UMT-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated