Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://umt-ir.umt.edu.my:8080/handle/123456789/21627
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Patrick L Cahill | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ian C Davidson | - |
dc.contributor.author | Javier A Atalah | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chris Cornelisen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Grant A Hopkins | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-02T11:46:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-02T11:46:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://umt-ir.umt.edu.my:8080/handle/123456789/21627 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Pests of bivalve aquaculture are a challenging problem that can reduce productivity, profitability and sustainability. A range of pest management approaches have been developed for bivalve aquaculture, but a general absence of guiding frameworks has limited the scale and permanency of implementation. Applying principles of ‘integrated pest management’ (IPM) could change this paradigm to improve economic and environmental outcomes. We reviewed existing research and tools for pest management in bivalve aquaculture, with studies grouped under five pillars of IPM: pest ecology (25 studies), bioeconomic cost–benefits (4 studies), continual monitoring (17 studies), proactive prevention (32 studies) and reactive control (65 studies). This body of knowledge, along with insights from terrestrial agriculture, provide a strong foundation for developing and implementing IPM in bivalve aquaculture. For example, IPM principles have been applied by a regional collective of oyster farmers in the US Pacific Northwest to optimize pesticide application and search for other options to control problematic burrowing shrimps. However, IPM has not yet been broadly applied in aquaculture, and data gaps and barriers to implementation need to be addressed. Priorities include establishing meaningful pest–crop bioeconomic relationships for various bivalve farming systems and improving the efficacy and operational scale of treatment approaches. An IPM framework also could guide potential stepchange improvements through directing selective breeding for resistance to pests, development of bespoke chemical control agents, applying emerging technologies for remote surveillance and farm management, and regional alignment of management interventions. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Online Library | en_US |
dc.subject | aquaculture | en_US |
dc.subject | bivalve | en_US |
dc.subject | biofouling | en_US |
dc.subject | integrated pest management | en_US |
dc.subject | pest | en_US |
dc.title | Toward integrated pest management in bivalve aquaculture | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | UMT Niche E-Book |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pest Management Science - 2022 - Cahill - Toward integrated pest management in bivalve aquaculture.pdf Restricted Access | 1.45 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in UMT-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated